Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1401

reference
920-tree-1
name
1401
tree-preservation-order

undefined

920-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.026240 50.867467)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.026099 50.867452,-1.026105 50.867480,-1.026125 50.867505,-1.026156 50.867525,-1.026195 50.867538,-1.026239 50.867543,-1.026283 50.867539,-1.026323 50.867527,-1.026355 50.867507,-1.026375 50.867482,-1.026383 50.867454,-1.026376 50.867426,-1.026357 50.867401,-1.026326 50.867381,-1.026286 50.867368,-1.026243 50.867363,-1.026199 50.867367,-1.026159 50.867380,-1.026127 50.867399,-1.026106 50.867424,-1.026099 50.867452)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL